<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS security and trust</title>
	<link>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/</link>
	<description>IT and security blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SSL MD5 PKI vulnerabilities threaten Web security &#124; The Secure Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-9013</link>
		<dc:creator>SSL MD5 PKI vulnerabilities threaten Web security &#124; The Secure Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-9013</guid>
		<description>[...] in order to allow the affected certificate authorities to remedy the vulnerability. Like the DNS research from last year, it may not be long before many other researchers start reverse engineering the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in order to allow the affected certificate authorities to remedy the vulnerability. Like the DNS research from last year, it may not be long before many other researchers start reverse engineering the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Barwood</title>
		<link>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>George Barwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>For Windows users, I am developing a public domain solution that offers 50 bits of security by default ( compared to the default windows resolver that appears to be totally insecure to me.

Installation is simple ( by a standard Windows installer, with no options ) and should take no more than a minute or two.

For more information please see http://www.george-barwood.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DnsServer/

and let me know if this could be useful to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Windows users, I am developing a public domain solution that offers 50 bits of security by default ( compared to the default windows resolver that appears to be totally insecure to me.</p>
<p>Installation is simple ( by a standard Windows installer, with no options ) and should take no more than a minute or two.</p>
<p>For more information please see <a href="http://www.george-barwood.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DnsServer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.george-barwood.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DnsServer/</a></p>
<p>and let me know if this could be useful to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-2407</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spamstopshere.com/blog/2008/08/04/dns-security-and-trust/#comment-2407</guid>
		<description>Awesome article!  This article clearly explains the importance of using a trusted DNS service.  This is an often overlooked security issue that most people don't know about or understand.  Thank you!

I use ifirefly at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article!  This article clearly explains the importance of using a trusted DNS service.  This is an often overlooked security issue that most people don&#8217;t know about or understand.  Thank you!</p>
<p>I use ifirefly at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
